dannyscott18 wrote:I was reading the issue 74 of 360 magazine and was intrigued by ur article on the trade in's. Personally, I believe it is an absolute outrage that EA and THQ are trying to make life worse for second-hand buyers (like me).
dannyscott18 wrote:The production of these games are a lot less than £40 so the producers' pockets must be lined with money, then EA and THQ complain because of the second-hand buyers apparently cheating the gaming market?
dannyscott18 wrote:Games producer's should encourage trade in's because, if they think about it, their going to attract the gamers who don't have a lot of money (me been a perfect example).

Bob wrote:You have to factor in the money that publishers and game shops make from games that wouldn't be bought if people couldn't use part exchanges as currency.
If little Billy has his copy of Fifa 09 and twenty quid he ain't buying FIFA 2010 unless he can part exchange..
So while EA will lose a sale of FIFA 09 to a second hand sale they gain a sale of FIFA 2010 that otherwise wouldn't of been possible.
These things aren't alway black and white.

Venomous Albino wrote:Bob wrote:You have to factor in the money that publishers and game shops make from games that wouldn't be bought if people couldn't use part exchanges as currency.
If little Billy has his copy of Fifa 09 and twenty quid he ain't buying FIFA 2010 unless he can part exchange..
So while EA will lose a sale of FIFA 09 to a second hand sale they gain a sale of FIFA 2010 that otherwise wouldn't of been possible.
These things aren't alway black and white.
Unless Billy takes his copy of FIFA 09 into a shop, trades it in and buys FIFA 10 second hand. Then Billy takes his second hand game and bottle of Peter Moore's tears home with a big, smug grin on his face.

Venomous Albino wrote:He's on about buying second hand games though. So whether Billy - I'm growing fond of this Billy, so we'll carry on using him as an example - trades something in or not, if Billy buys a second hand game, the publisher still gets nowt.
biron_w wrote:I was quite interested in the bit where the publisher said that it's because of the second hand market that games are still expensive,and if that went games would be cheaper. Well why don't they try selling them cheaper then to get rid of the second hand market?

Venomous Albino wrote:biron_w wrote:I was quite interested in the bit where the publisher said that it's because of the second hand market that games are still expensive,and if that went games would be cheaper. Well why don't they try selling them cheaper then to get rid of the second hand market?
That's one hell of a risk though. Imagine if the RRP of boxed, new games was shunted down to £30 and the second hand market didn't go away. It would be disastrous.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest